Live HTML, not static images
Output is clickable, testable, refinable. You can edit inline, talk to it, drag sliders.
It judges layout the way a senior art director does, iterates faster than any human, reads images, writes the code, and ships the result. This page is a hands-on guide to using all of that — with recipes you can run today.
If you've only used Claude as a chatbot, this is the page that changes how you think about it.
Anthropic launched Claude Design on April 17, 2026 — a dedicated product for turning prompts into prototypes, slide decks, one-pagers, and mockups. Powered by Opus 4.7. In research preview for Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans.
Output is clickable, testable, refinable. You can edit inline, talk to it, drag sliders.
Reads your team's design files and codebase so output matches your existing visual style.
PDF, sharable URL, PPTX, or send straight to Canva.
One instruction packages the design as a handoff bundle for Claude Code — exploration to production code, closed loop.
Refine by talking, by inline-commenting, or by dragging sliders for spacing/scale/density.
Inside the Claude desktop app and on claude.ai, alongside Cowork and Chat. Same login, same context.
The recipes and patterns below all work in Claude Design and in plain Artifacts on claude.ai and with the frontend-design plugin in Claude Code. Pick the surface that matches your task — Claude Design for prototype-grade exploration, Artifacts for one-off Q&A, frontend-design for production-grade UI in a real codebase.
Twenty-three design vocabularies, twenty-three live examples on this network. Each one was built with Claude — Artifacts, Claude Design, or the frontend-design plugin. Click through to see the real thing. Sites are grouped by visual register: editorial & archival, real estate, sports & fan, e-commerce & storefront, content & reference, BBS & terminal, service & landing, guide & magazine.
Long-form fan archive. Serif body type, restrained palette, strong hierarchy. Wayback restoration.
Dark editorial luxury. Dense typography, gold accents, calm authority. Zero-competition keyword spoke.
Cream paper, sage accents, calculator UI. Built for retirees searching for "should we move there."
Bulletin-board nostalgia rebuilt as a modern web app. Mono type, deliberate scanlines, real DBs underneath.
Family/cultural archive. Generous whitespace, gallery-grade imagery, scholarly tone.
UT burnt orange + Big Shoulders Display + cream paper. frontend-design rebuild, owner-confirmed brilliant, live same day.
26-page mega-hub with 25 niche subdomains. Map + listings + calc + lead form, brand.json swap-to-rebrand.
Regency literary-magazine palette: Cormorant Garamond, cream paper, dusty rose. Storefront with affiliate inventory.
21-page short-term-rental guide. Three theme variants, revenue calculator, case studies. Network's highest measured human traffic.
Women's basketball reference: WNBA + global + Olympics + college + Texas + HS, 1,227-program directory, Chrome extension.
The page you're on. Dark editorial guide aesthetic. #d97757 Anthropic warm + Space Grotesk + Inter + JetBrains Mono.
Sister property to austintexasfans — same content backbone, distinctly different visual register. Burnt orange softened with charcoal slabs and a tighter grid. Demonstrates one-content-many-skins.
Third pass on the same Austin-sports content with a third design language — condensed display type, photographic hero band, denser cards. Three siblings, three brand voices, all from one Claude session.
Pro-women's-basketball magazine layout: serif display type, oversized hero quotes, cover-story-grade hierarchy. Sister to girlhoop's reference register.
Mythos-ready service-pitch site. Cormorant Garamond display + Source Serif body + Inter UI on cream paper, with a dedicated Provenance callout for the 1996 BBS-era heritage. Two-tier (public marketing · auth-gated CRM).
Live-show identity. Bold display type, Zoom-tile callout grid, slideshow-friendly aspect ratios. Built for OBS overlays and shared-screen visibility, not desktop reading.
True period-correct BBS aesthetic — phosphor green-on-black, Courier monospace, scanline texture, ASCII boxes. 81 topical conferences, archives back to 2000. The deeper version of atxbbs's homage.
Regency literary magazine. Cormorant Garamond + cream paper + dusty rose accents. A different Austen-vocabulary from the storefront — this one closer to a Sunday literary supplement.
Twelve-page Bastrop, TX area guide. Modernized clone of a tired 2014 site. Deep serif display, neutral palette, photo-driven hero per page. Demonstrates the cloning workflow described below.
Hub site for a Hot Springs realtor. Navy & gold palette, competitive analysis pages, domain-valuation language. Different luxury register than lakehamiltonhomesforsale — trust-and-depth instead of cinematic.
Outbound-prospecting AI-services landing. Institutional voice (no founder name in copy), Austin-region targeting. Audit form on the right rail; submitted leads land in a private admin dashboard.
Sibling to atxaisites.com targeting Hot Springs / Lake Hamilton businesses. Same scaffolding, distinct visual register: warmer palette, slower rhythm, lake-water gradients in the hero.
Artist + writer portfolio. Generous gallery grid, biographical depth, restrained typography. Built to feel like the inside cover of a coffee-table monograph.
Want a different vocabulary? Hand Claude a screenshot of any site you admire and ask for “this energy.” The catalog above is just what we’ve shipped — Claude can match almost any visual language you can describe. The most useful pattern is to feed in two reference screenshots (the brand voice you want and the layout you want) and ask Claude to merge their conventions.
A whole separate skill: feeding Claude an existing website (yours, a Wayback archive of one that disappeared, or a client's tired 2014 design) and having it study the structure, decide what to keep, redesign what's tired, rebuild the whole thing cleanly, and verify nothing went missing.
Nine steps, fourteen sections, seven copy-paste prompts. Capture · audit · decide · brief · prototype · build · improve · verify · ship. Three real case studies from this network.
Claude reads images, has internalized a vast catalog of well-designed sites, writes clean HTML/CSS, judges its own output, and iterates instantly. The combination is more useful than any single skill in isolation.
Drop a screenshot, a sketch, a logo, a moodboard. Claude treats pixels as content. "Build me this" is a real prompt.
It has seen Stripe, Linear, Vercel, Apple, Frank Chimero. Ask for "editorial" or "Linear-flavored" and it understands.
HTML, CSS, Tailwind, React, SVG, Mermaid — all native. The artifact updates in seconds.
"Tighten the type, shrink the hero, swap the green for cream." A version is back before you finish your coffee.
Ask "what would you fix here?" and Claude critiques honestly — alignment, contrast, hierarchy.
It can output a tokens file, a component library, and a sample page that all use the same vocabulary.
Four entry points. Pick the one that fits the task and the medium.
Best for: single pages, prototypes, components, charts. Zero setup. Live preview pane updates as you iterate. Copy the HTML or React when done. Open claude.ai →
Best for: bigger projects with multiple files — a full site, a small app. Cloud sandbox; nothing to install. Branches and previews live. Open claude.ai/code →
Best for: work in an existing codebase. Claude reads the repo, edits files, runs the dev server, tests in a browser, commits. See /newby or /newby-mac to install.
Best for: distinctive, production-grade UI that doesn't look "AI-generated." Adds a /frontend-design skill to Claude Code. Walk-through below ↓
There's one rhythm under every recipe in this guide. Learn it once and the rest is variation.
The fastest possible win. Open a fresh chat, paste a brief, get a polished hero you can drop into any page.
Same workflow as the hero, scaled up. Treat each section as its own brief. Don't try to one-shot the whole page — Claude will do it, but the quality drops.
Claude reads images. This is the most under-used capability for design work.
Generate tokens, components, and a sample page that all share one vocabulary. Useful when you have many pages to build and want them to feel like a family.
tokens.css.You have an old site. The bones are fine; the surface is dated. This is the highest-leverage use of Claude on the web today.
/archive-YYYY-MM-DD/. Don't delete anything until the new version is live and verified.A Claude Code plugin from Anthropic that loads a richer "designer brain" the moment you invoke it — better defaults around typography, spacing, color theory, and the small details that tip a page from "AI-generated" to "indistinguishable from human work."
~/.claude/skills/./frontend-design in any session. Brief Claude as you would normally; the plugin shapes the output./frontend-design. The output is consistently a tier higher than baseline Claude.Claude doesn't make raster images. It does, however, write excellent prompts for the tools that do — and orchestrate the whole pipeline. The pattern is: Claude is the art director, the image model is the photographer.
For icons, hero shapes, charts, flow diagrams, technical illustrations — Claude writes SVG and Mermaid directly. Often faster and crisper than running an image model. Always ask first: "could this be an SVG?"
Each of these tools is excellent at a specific seam. The trick is using them together — Claude as the brain, the others as specialized hands.
Google's AI design tool — describe a UI in plain language, get a Figma-quality multi-screen design. Best at exploring a visual direction quickly. Pair: Stitch generates the look, Claude codes it. Export the Stitch screen, drop the PNG into Claude with "build this in HTML/Tailwind."
The industry-standard design surface. Pair: Figma is the canvas, Claude is the dev. Export a frame as PNG, drop it into Claude, get production code. Or use a Figma MCP server (Anthropic + community) so Claude reads your Figma file directly.
Generates polished React + Tailwind components from a prompt. Pair: v0 produces the component, Claude weaves it in — adapting it to your tokens and integrating with surrounding code. Best when you want a specific React/shadcn vocabulary.
Editors that already speak Claude. Pair: edit-and-preview loops live in the IDE, the dev server hot-reloads, Claude sees both. Closest thing to "design partner sitting next to you."
The temptation is "tighten the hero, swap the green, fix the FAQ, and shrink the footer." Claude will do all four, but the result drifts. Three changes max per round; one when you're closing in on done.
If you keep saying "more like this site… no wait, more like that one… no, like this third one," Claude blurs them. Pick one anchor and stick with it for a session.
Take a screenshot of the current state and drop it back in with your critique. "Here's what I'm seeing — the hero feels short. Make it taller and quieter." Beats describing in words alone.
Rather than only "what's wrong?" — Claude is a better critic than its prompt usually invites. Ask it for what isn't there yet.
Every couple of rounds, save the current HTML to disk. If a later round goes sideways you can return to a known-good state instead of arguing your way back.